.jpg)
In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the profound impact emotional and psychological injuries can have on accident victims. Emotional distress is not always visible, but its effects can be just as debilitating as physical injuries. For many victims, emotional trauma can prevent them from returning to work, maintaining relationships, or enjoying everyday activities they once took for granted.
The inclusion of emotional distress in personal injury claims ensures that victims receive compensation not only for the visible, physical injuries but also for the mental and emotional suffering they endure. This acknowledgment helps address the full scope of harm a person experiences following an accident, providing a path toward financial recovery that encompasses both physical and psychological damages.
In legal terms, emotional distress refers to the psychological suffering and mental anguish that a person endures due to a traumatic or harmful event. It encompasses a range of mental health symptoms and conditions such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), fear, humiliation, and psychological trauma. Emotional distress can arise from the physical injuries sustained in an accident or from the emotional impact of the event itself. In personal injury cases, emotional distress is often categorized as non-economic damage, meaning it does not have a direct monetary value like medical bills or lost wages but is still compensable due to its significant effect on a victim’s quality of life.
For example, a victim involved in a serious car accident may experience ongoing anxiety, fear of driving, or nightmares related to the incident. Likewise, a person who suffers a violent assault may develop PTSD, which can lead to severe emotional suffering long after their physical injuries have healed. Emotional distress can deeply affect daily activities, relationships, and a person’s overall sense of well-being, making it an important component in personal injury claims.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress occurs when one party's extreme or outrageous conduct is intended to, or recklessly causes, severe emotional harm to another person. The behavior in these cases is not just negligent or accidental but is intended to cause emotional pain, or is so reckless that it results in significant psychological trauma. To prove IIED, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's actions were beyond what a reasonable person would tolerate, and the emotional distress suffered was severe.
An example of IIED might involve an employer who repeatedly harasses and humiliates an employee in front of others, leading to severe emotional trauma. Another scenario could be a situation where someone intentionally makes false, harmful accusations to damage another person’s reputation and mental health. In these cases, the conduct is deliberate and aimed at causing harm, making it possible for the victim to claim emotional distress as a direct result of the defendant's behavior.
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED)
In contrast, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress arises when emotional distress is caused by negligence rather than intentional harm. In these cases, the defendant did not intend to cause emotional distress but failed to act with reasonable care, resulting in the victim’s psychological suffering. To succeed in a NIED claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant’s negligent actions directly caused the emotional distress and that this distress was a foreseeable consequence of their negligence.
A common example of NIED would be a car accident where a driver’s negligence caused a traumatic collision, leading to emotional distress in the victim. Even though the driver did not intend to cause emotional harm, their careless actions resulted in psychological suffering, such as PTSD or anxiety, for the victim. In such cases, the emotional distress is a natural consequence of the accident, making the negligent party liable.
One of the most important elements in proving emotional distress is thorough documentation of symptoms. Emotional distress, such as anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), can be difficult to visualize, but medical and psychological records provide solid evidence of the impact on the victim’s mental health.
Victims of emotional distress should seek care from qualified professionals, such as psychologists or psychiatrists, who can properly evaluate their condition. These medical records are key in personal injury cases because they show a clear connection between the emotional suffering and the injury or event. Psychological evaluations, diagnoses, and therapist reports can all serve as evidence, outlining the duration, intensity, and progression of the emotional distress. Such documentation ensures that the victim’s suffering is recognized as a legitimate component of their claim, demonstrating the impact of the incident on their psychological well-being.
In addition to professional evaluations, medications prescribed for emotional distress, such as antidepressants or anti-anxiety medications, may also be used to further document the severity of the emotional impact and show the need for ongoing treatment.
Another powerful way to prove emotional distress in court is through expert testimony. Mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, or counselors, are often called upon as expert witnesses to explain the emotional and psychological impact of the injury or event. These experts offer objective, clinical insights into the victim’s condition and can speak to the diagnosis, treatment plan, and prognosis for recovery.
In personal injury cases, expert witnesses can explain how the trauma has affected the plaintiff’s daily life and provide a professional perspective on the severity of the emotional distress. They may describe how symptoms like anxiety, flashbacks, depression, or insomnia have impaired the plaintiff’s ability to work, socialize, or carry out normal daily activities. Expert testimony is especially valuable because it provides the court with an authoritative explanation of the emotional suffering the victim is experiencing, translating subjective pain into understandable medical terms that can strengthen the plaintiff’s case.
While medical records and expert testimony are essential, the plaintiff’s own testimony plays a crucial role in proving emotional distress. The plaintiff is often the best person to describe how their emotional state has been affected by the injury. By recounting their personal experiences, the plaintiff can give the court a detailed understanding of how the trauma has impacted their mental health, daily life, and overall well-being.
The plaintiff’s personal testimony may describe emotional symptoms such as feelings of helplessness, fear, sadness, or difficulty sleeping. They might also explain how the incident has caused them to avoid certain activities, struggle with relationships, or face challenges at work. This personal account makes the emotional impact more tangible for the court, illustrating the depth of the distress and the ways it has affected the plaintiff’s quality of life.
In addition to the plaintiff’s own testimony, statements from family, friends, and coworkers can also be powerful. These individuals can describe changes in the plaintiff’s behavior, mood, and ability to engage in normal activities since the incident. This supporting testimony from those closest to the plaintiff helps to corroborate their account and demonstrate that the emotional toll is real and significant.
One of the most important factors courts consider is the severity of the emotional distress. To assess this, courts examine the duration, intensity, and long-term impact of the emotional suffering. For example, mild, temporary anxiety may not be considered severe enough to warrant compensation, but prolonged symptoms like clinical depression or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are more likely to be taken seriously.
Courts look at whether the emotional distress has caused significant disruption to the plaintiff's life, such as an inability to work, participate in social activities, or carry out daily responsibilities. The more severe and lasting the emotional distress, the more likely the court is to award compensation. Testimony from mental health professionals, the plaintiff’s own account, and supporting statements from family members or coworkers all play a role in establishing the severity of the emotional distress.
In any emotional distress claim, the plaintiff must prove causation, which means demonstrating that the emotional distress was directly caused by the defendant’s actions or negligence. It is not enough for the plaintiff to simply be experiencing emotional distress; they must establish a clear connection between the distress and the incident that gave rise to the personal injury claim.
For example, if a person develops PTSD after being involved in a serious car accident caused by the defendant, they must show that the psychological trauma is a direct result of the accident and not from other unrelated factors. The plaintiff’s attorney may use medical records, psychological evaluations, and testimony from mental health experts to demonstrate this cause-and-effect relationship.
Courts often give greater weight to emotional distress claims that have a physical manifestation. While emotional distress is a psychological issue, it can frequently produce physical symptoms that are easier to verify and more tangible to the court. Some common physical manifestations of emotional distress include insomnia, headaches, gastrointestinal problems, fatigue, and even panic attacks.
When emotional distress leads to such physical symptoms, it can strengthen the plaintiff’s case by providing objective evidence of their suffering. A medical expert might testify about how the plaintiff’s emotional distress has resulted in physical health problems, offering further proof that the distress is genuine and severe. Courts are generally more likely to award damages when the emotional suffering has a clear and measurable impact on the plaintiff’s physical well-being.
Another important factor courts consider is whether the plaintiff had any pre-existing emotional or psychological conditions before the incident. Pre-existing conditions, such as anxiety or depression, can complicate emotional distress claims because the court must determine whether the plaintiff’s current emotional distress is a direct result of the accident or injury, or if it was simply a continuation of an existing condition.
However, even if a plaintiff had pre-existing conditions, they may still recover damages if they can prove that the defendant’s actions worsened their condition. This is known as the "eggshell plaintiff rule," which states that defendants are responsible for exacerbating a plaintiff’s pre-existing conditions, even if the plaintiff was already vulnerable. In such cases, the plaintiff must present medical evidence showing that their emotional state has significantly deteriorated as a direct result of the accident, not merely as part of their pre-existing condition.
If you or a loved one is suffering from emotional distress as a result of an accident or injury, it’s essential to work with an experienced legal team that understands the complexities of emotional distress claims. The Law Offices of Tim D. Wright has extensive experience advocating for the full scope of a plaintiff’s injuries, including both physical and emotional harm. We are committed to helping you maximize your compensation and get the support you need.
Contact us today for expert legal guidance. Reach out to the Law Offices of Tim D. Wright at (323) 379-9995 or visit timwrightlaw.com to schedule your free consultation. Let us help you recover the compensation you deserve for your emotional and psychological injuries.
